header-logo header-logo

17 February 2023
Issue: 8013 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 17 February 2023

Citizenship

R (on the application of Roehrig) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] EWHC 31 (Admin), [2023] All ER (D) 04 (Feb)

The Administrative Court dismissed the claimant’s judicial review claim, challenging the Secretary of State’s decision to refuse to grant him a British passport. The claimant had contended that, at his birth in October 2000, he had become a British citizen by virtue of s 1(1)(b) of the British Nationality Act 1981 (BNA 1981) because, on that date, his French mother (who had then been resident in the UK by virtue of her status as a worker who was a citizen of an EU member state) had been settled in the UK, within the meaning of BNA 1981. The question of whether the claimant had acquired British citizenship on his birth depended on whether the mother had been subject to immigration laws, such that she had not been settled for the purposes of BNA 1981when the claimant had been born. The court held that: (i) the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2000, SI 2000/2326, were ‘immigration laws’; (ii)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll