header-logo header-logo

16 September 2022
Issue: 7994 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 16 September 2022

Claim Form

Alhilfi and another v Hussain and others [2022] EWHC 2150 (Ch), [2022] All ER (D) 82 (Aug)

The Chancery Division dismissed an application for permission to amend the particulars of claim to bring a claim under a constructive trust. The first claimant, who was resident in Dubai, brought a claim, seeking proprietary and other relief in relation to money he had invested in the acquisition of shares in the second and third defendant companies and by investing in properties in London, and contending that he was entitled to a 50% beneficial interest in those properties. The amended particulars of claim sought to set out the basis on which his primary claim to be the beneficiary of a constructive trust arose and sought to rely on an oral agreement and a document written in Arabic, which was said to be evidence of the oral agreement. The court held that the oral agreement was unclear and fell far short of providing certainty that would be needed for a binding contract and, to the extent the test could be a lower one, far

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll