header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 16 January 2026

16 January 2026
Issue: 8145 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Company

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Purity Ltd [2025] EWHC 3401 (Ch)

The Chancery Division granted HMRC's winding-up petition against Purity Ltd, the first such petition presented under s 85, Finance Act 2022, which permits HMRC to seek the winding-up of tax avoidance scheme promoters when it is expedient in the public interest for the protection of public revenue. The court found Purity was a ‘relevant body’ under s 85 and that it was just and equitable to wind up the company on three grounds: first, Purity's tax avoidance scheme caused substantial tax loss; second, Purity demonstrated lack of transparency to both employees and HMRC; and third, Purity represented a continuation of a similar business previously conducted by Alpha Republic Ltd, which had also been liquidated following HMRC investigation. The court determined that compulsory liquidation was appropriate despite Purity already being in creditors' voluntary liquidation, emphasising the need for full investigation by independent office-holders and to send a clear message to tax avoidance scheme promoters.


Costs

R v Jacob (formerly Oyemola) [2025] EWCA Crim 1709

The Court of Appeal dismissed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll