header-logo header-logo

15 July 2022
Issue: 7987 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 15 July 2022

Company

Re ALL Scheme Ltd [2022] EWHC 549 (Ch), [2022] All ER (D) 121 (Mar)

The Chancery Division allowed an application, brought by a newly established company which had executed a deed poll to assume joint liability to creditors of a group of companies (Amigo), for permission to convene simultaneous scheme meetings to consider two alternative schemes of arrangement under Part 26 of the Companies Act 2006, namely the New Business Scheme (NBS) and the Wind-Down Scheme (WDS), in circumstances where Amigo, providers of guarantor loans, faced a significant number of claims, made through the Financial Ombudsman (FOS fee claims) or otherwise (redress claims), in relation to their mis-sale of loans based on the affordability for the customers. The court held that: (i) as in Re Port Finance Investment Limited [2021] EWHC 378 (Ch), there was no obvious ‘roadblock’ which would lead the court at the sanction hearing to consider that the release of Amigo companies and their directors by way of the deed of release fell outside the scope of Part 26; (ii) there had been no sufficiently material dissimilarity

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll