header-logo header-logo

14 November 2025
Issue: 8139 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 14 November 2025

Costs

Hood v Southern Land Securities Ltd and another company [2025] UKUT 378 (LC)

The UK Upper Tribunal, Lands Chamber (UT) dismissed Mr Hood’s appeal against a costs order made by the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) in land registration proceedings. The FTT had awarded Mr Hood costs up to 5 February 2025 but ordered him to pay his landlords’ costs of £10,181 incurred after that date. The costs order was made on the basis that Mr Hood had unreasonably refused the landlords’ settlement offer, which would have granted him a lease of the loft space at a peppercorn rent. The UT found that the outcome Mr Hood achieved at the FTT hearing (an expanded demise under his existing lease) was not better than what had been offered in settlement. His refusal to accept the offer unless the landlords proved they had not illegally acquired the freehold was unreasonable, as this matter was extraneous to the proceedings. The UT rejected the respondents’ application for costs of the appeal, noting that costs are not normally awarded in cases assigned to the written representations procedure.


Housing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll