header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 14 November 2025

14 November 2025
Issue: 8139 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Costs

Hood v Southern Land Securities Ltd and another company [2025] UKUT 378 (LC)

The UK Upper Tribunal, Lands Chamber (UT) dismissed Mr Hood’s appeal against a costs order made by the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) in land registration proceedings. The FTT had awarded Mr Hood costs up to 5 February 2025 but ordered him to pay his landlords’ costs of £10,181 incurred after that date. The costs order was made on the basis that Mr Hood had unreasonably refused the landlords’ settlement offer, which would have granted him a lease of the loft space at a peppercorn rent. The UT found that the outcome Mr Hood achieved at the FTT hearing (an expanded demise under his existing lease) was not better than what had been offered in settlement. His refusal to accept the offer unless the landlords proved they had not illegally acquired the freehold was unreasonable, as this matter was extraneous to the proceedings. The UT rejected the respondents’ application for costs of the appeal, noting that costs are not normally awarded in cases assigned to the written representations procedure.


Housing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll