header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 14 February 2025

14 February 2025
Issue: 8104 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Costs

Rana and another v Assethold Ltd [2025] UKUT 19 (LC)

The Upper Tribunal found that the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) had erred in its decision regarding three specific items of expenditure and its refusal to award costs under Rule 13(1)(b) of the Tribunal Proceedings (FTT) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013. It determined that the costs for internal decoration of flat 2 and the replacement of a fan in flat 3 were not payable, and that the cost for external decoration was not reasonably incurred. The tribunal also found that the respondent’s conduct was unreasonable and awarded costs to the appellants.

Trappit SA and other companies v GBT Services UK Ltd [2024] EWHC 3285 (Ch)

The court held that the claimants had not provided cogent reasons to depart from the usual rule under CPR 38.6 that a claimant who discontinues is liable for the defendant’s costs incurred up to the date of discontinuance. The court also held that the defendant’s conduct was not sufficiently out of the norm to warrant indemnity costs being awarded.


Evidence

Morris v Williams [2025] EWHC 218 (KB)

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll