header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 12 December 2025

12 December 2025
Issue: 8143 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Contract

Credit Suisse Life (Bermuda) Ltd v Ivanishvili and others (Bermuda) [2025] UKPC 53

The Privy Council allowed the appellant Credit Suisse Life (Bermuda) Ltd’s (‘CS Life’) appeal in part, but only regarding the start dates for the assessment of damages for breach of contract. The board dismissed CS Life’s appeal on all other grounds, affirming the findings of the Bermudian courts that CS Life had a contractual obligation to invest policy assets according to the discretionary mandate chosen by the policyholders, which it breached when the assets were instead fraudulently mismanaged by Patrice Lescaudron, a relationship manager at Credit Suisse AG. The board found that CS Life was liable for breach of contract but rejected CS Life’s arguments that it had no relevant contractual duties, that damages should be calculated differently, and that liability should end earlier. The board also dismissed the cross-appeal by the respondent the former Georgian Prime Minister Bidzina Ivanishvili and other respondents seeking to restore the Chief Justice’s finding of fraudulent misrepresentation, holding that the claim was time-barred under Georgian law, which applied under Bermuda’s double actionability

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll