header-logo header-logo

11 November 2022
Issue: 8002 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 11 November 2022

Children

Re A (children) (pool of perpetrators) [2022] EWCA Civ 1348, [2022] All ER (D) 76 (Oct)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, allowed the father’s appeal against the decision of the Family Court that made findings against the parents of a baby, A, of a failure to protect and of collusion. A had sustained life-threatening injuries while in the care of her parents. The issues before the court were: (i) whether the judge erred in his application of the law in relation to uncertain perpetrator cases and, as a consequence, was in error in finding that the father was within the pool of possible perpetrators in relation to the earlier fracture and head injuries sustained by A; and (ii) whether the judge was wrong to find that he, the father, had colluded with the mother and, if he was not the perpetrator, whether he had failed to protect A from his mother. The court held, among other things, that the finding that the father was in the pool of potential perpetrators could not stand and the case had to be remitted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll