header-logo header-logo

11 August 2023
Issue: 8037 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 11 August 2023

Competition

Evans v Barclays Bank PLC and others [2023] EWCA Civ 876, [2023] All ER (D) 138 (Jul)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, allowing the appeal, held that the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) had erred in certifying the instant cartel claims on an opt-in basis because the two factors of relevance to the decision were the strength of the claim and practicability, and on those two factors the CAT erred and, accordingly, the order was set aside to the extent that it made an order for opt-in proceedings.


Costs

Chapman v Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust [2023] EWHC 1871 (KB), [2023] All ER (D) 121 (Jul)

The King’s Bench Division ruled on the costs that arose from the claimant’s successful claim for clinical negligence against a hospital. The claimant contended that the defendant should have paid her costs of the claim, in which the defendant argued that there should have been no order for costs, or alternatively, they should only have been ordered to pay a percentage of the claimant’s costs. It fell to be determined: (i) what

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll