header-logo header-logo

11 April 2025
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 11 April 2025

Care

Neath Port Talbot CBC, the Local Authority v Mrs AA and others [2025] EWFC 83 (B)

This was a public law case in which the court made findings that the mother had induced illness in her son (Y) by administering medication to cause episodes of ataxia and other symptoms. The mother had also fabricated and exaggerated Y’s illnesses over a period of seven years, and the father had failed to protect Y by not correcting the mother’s exaggerations despite being aware of them. The re-habitation of the two children, X and Y, into the care of their father was in their best welfare interest, which was the court’s paramount consideration. Care orders were made for Y and X to be rehabilitated to the father’s care under a robust transition plan with support and supervision due to the risks posed by the mother’s ongoing manipulation. The local authority was directed to invite a safeguarding review.


Costs

DF v YB [2025] EWFC 76 (B)

This was a costs application following earlier financial remedy proceedings between the parties in the Family Court.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll