header-logo header-logo

15 January 2009
Issue: 7352 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Law digest: Legal profession

C v W [2008] EWCA Civ 1459, [2008] All ER (D) 239 (Dec)

Where a conditional fee agreement includes a term to the effect that: “If we advise you to reject an off er of settlement or payment into court and the case goes ahead to trial where you are awarded damages which are equal to or less than the offer or payment in, you do not have to pay any of our basic costs or percentage increase for the work done after we receive notice of the off er or payment in”, it is worth considering the inclusion of a variant of the two-stage success fee discussed in Callery v Gray [2001] EWCA Civ 1117, [2001] 3 All ER 833, in the form of a clause giving them the right to review the success fee once an offer to which the clause applies has been made (See Law reports p 73–74).
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll