Lichter & Schwarz v Rubin [2008] EWHC 450 (Ch D)
On an interim application for the disclosure of “information about relevant property or assets which are or may be the subject of an application for a freezing injunction”, pursuant to CPR 25.1(1)(g), it is necessary to show only a reasonable possibility, based on credible evidence, that there will be such an application.
20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins
Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London
Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing
