header-logo header-logo

04 February 2010
Issue: 7403 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Civil procedure

Lombard North Central PLC v Automobile World (UK) Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 20, [2010] All ER (D) 166 (Jan)

It was a basic principle of the system of civil procedure that the factual case the parties sought to asset at trial had ordinarily to be set out in their statements of case. That was not a principle based on mere formalism.

It was essential to the conduct of a fair trial that each side should know in advance what case the other was making and thus what case it had to meet and prepare for. It was the function of the pleadings to provide that information. The principle applied as much to litigants in person as to lawyers.

There was no duty on a judge trying a civil claim to check with a litigant in person to inquire as to whether such a litigant in person wished to amend his pleadings to raise any particular issues that he had not pleaded. It was for the litigant to decide what case he wished to make and how to make it. It was not for the judge to step

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll