header-logo header-logo

17 May 2007
Issue: 7273 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment Law

Blundell v Governing Body of St Andrews Catholic Primary School [2007] All ER (D) 159 (May)

The Employment Appeal Tribunal considered the effect of reg 18 of the Maternity and Parental Leave (etc) Regulations 1999 (SI 1999/3312), which provide that where a woman returns to work after maternity leave, she is entitled to return from leave to the job in which she was employed before her absence.

Held The aim of the regulations is to provide that a returnee came back to a work situation as near as possible to that she left. The employment tribunal should bear in mind both the purposes of the legislation and the fact that the regulations themselves provide for exceptional cases, namely that where it is not reasonably practicable for the employer to permit her to return to her previous job, he might provide for her return to another job which was both suitable for her and appropriate for her to do in the circumstances.

Where the woman’s role was variable, the tribunal is not obliged to freeze time at the precise moment its occupant took maternity leave, but may have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll