header-logo header-logo

31 May 2007
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CRIMINAL EVIDENCE

DPP v Chand [2007] EWHC 90 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 64 (Jan)

The principle laid down in R v Hanson [2005] EWCA Crim 824, [2005] All ER (D) 380 (Mar), that the appellate court will not interfere with the judge’s judgment about the capacity of prior events to establish propensity—under s 101 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003—unless the decision is plainly wrong, or discretion has been exercised unreasonably in the Wednesbury sense, applies equally to the Divisional Court when considering an appeal against a decision of a magistrates’ court.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll