header-logo header-logo

CRIMINAL EVIDENCE

31 May 2007
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

DPP v Chand [2007] EWHC 90 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 64 (Jan)

The principle laid down in R v Hanson [2005] EWCA Crim 824, [2005] All ER (D) 380 (Mar), that the appellate court will not interfere with the judge’s judgment about the capacity of prior events to establish propensity—under s 101 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003—unless the decision is plainly wrong, or discretion has been exercised unreasonably in the Wednesbury sense, applies equally to the Divisional Court when considering an appeal against a decision of a magistrates’ court.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll