header-logo header-logo

31 May 2007
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CIVIL LITIGATION

Marcan Shipping (London) Ltd v Candida Corporation [2007] EWCA Civ 463, [2007] All ER (D) 277 (May)

The sanction embodied in an “unless” order takes effect without the need for any further order if the party to whom it is addressed fails to comply with it in any material respect. It is therefore unnecessary, and inappropriate, for a party who seeks to rely on such non-compliance to make an application to the court for the sanction to be imposed, since that sanction takes effect automatically as a result of the failure to comply with the order.

 If an application to enter judgment is made under CPR 3.5(5), the court’s function is limited to deciding what order should properly be made to reflect them sanction which has  already taken effect. Unless the party in default has  applied for relief, or the court itself decides for some exceptional reason that it should act of its own initiative, the question of whether the sanction ought to apply does not arise. It must be assumed that, at the time of making the order, the court considered all the relevant factors and reached

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll