header-logo header-logo

16 August 2007
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

R (Kelly) v Warley Magistrates’ Court [2007] EWHC 1836 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 506 (Jul)

The defence was ordered—under Pt 3.10 of the Criminal Procedure Rules—to supply the full names, dates of birth and addresses of all defence witnesses to be called at trial.

The defendant applied to have the direction quashed. It was held that the subject matter of the direction was covered by both litigation privilege and legal professional privilege, and the court did not have power to override them.

Such a requirement would require statutory authority, and the relevant provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 have not yet been brought into force.

Issue: 7286 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll