header-logo header-logo

20 September 2007
Issue: 7289 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

FAMILY LAW

Re P (a child) (adoption order: leave to oppose making of adoption order) [2007] EWCA Civ 616, [2007] All ER (D) 334 (Jun)

The Adoption and Children Act 2002 (ACA 2002), ss 1(1) and (7), apply only to decisions under ACA 2002 and do not include coming to a decision about granting leave in any other circumstances, including decisions about granting leave in proceedings under the Children Act 1989.

An application for leave to defend adoption proceedings under ACA 2002, s 47(5) involves a two-stage process: (i) the court has to be satisfied, on the facts of the case, that there has been a change in circumstances within s 47(7), and if there has been no change in circumstances, the application must fail; (ii) if there has been a change in circumstances, the court has a discretion to permit the parents to defend the adoption proceedings. 

The decision whether or not to grant leave is governed by ACA 2002, s 1, and the paramount consideration for the court must be the child’s welfare throughout his life. When deciding either limb, the judge has a discretion whether or not to hear oral evidence.

It is not necessary for the judge to conduct a full welfare hearing unless the issues which arise for decision positively require one, or require oral evidence in one or more particular respects.

Issue: 7289 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll