header-logo header-logo

18 October 2007
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Civil Litigation

Bhandari v UK (App No 42341/04) [2007] All ER (D) 18 (Oct)

This case concerned the right, under Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), to have a hearing within a reasonable time.

HELD When determining the period to be taken into account in civil proceedings, the “reasonable time” begins when the action is instituted and extends to the decision which disposes of the dispute. Where there are separate sets of proceedings, those proceedings may only be considered in toto where they are inseparable and concern essentially the same dispute.

The reasonableness of the length of proceedings has to be assessed in the light of the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities, and what is at stake for the applicant in the dispute. Moreover, the state is responsible for the efficiency of its system; if a state allows proceedings to continue beyond the “reasonable time’ prescribed by Art 6(1) without doing anything to advance them, it will be responsible for the resultant delay.

Issue: 7293 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll