header-logo header-logo

TORT

22 February 2007
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Tamares (Vincent Square) Ltd v Fairpoint Properties (Vincent Square) Ltd [2007] EWHC 212 (Ch), [2007] All ER (D) 103 (Feb)

The court summarised the principles applicable to the assessment of damages for loss of the ability to prevent an infringement of a right to light:

(i) The court must attempt to find what would be a fair result of a hypothetical negotiation between the parties.

(ii) The context, including the nature and
seriousness of the breach, should be kept in mind.

(iii) The right to prevent a development (or part) gives the owner of the right a significant bargaining position. (iv) The owner of the right with such a bargaining position would normally be
expected to receive some part of the likely profit from the development.

(v) If there is no evidence of the likely profit, the court may award a suitable multiple of the damages for loss of amenity.

(vi) If there is evidence of the likely the profit, the court should normally award a sum which takes into account a fair percentage of the profit.

(vii) The size of the award should not be so large that the development would not have taken place had such a sum been payable.

(viii) The court should consider whether the deal feels right.

 

Issue: 7261 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll