header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

TORT

Aerospace Publishing Ltd v Thames Water Utilities [2007] EWCA Civ 3, [2007] All ER (D) 02 (Jan)

The defendant was a water undertaker for the purposes of the Water Industry Act 1991 (WIA 1991). One of its mains water pipes burst. A considerable quantity of the escaped water entered premises occupied by the claimants. In proceedings brought by the claimants, the defendant admitted liability pursuant to s 209, WIA 1991. One issue was whether the claimants could recover the cost of staff time.

HELD The fact and extent of the diversion of staff time must be properly established. If claimants do not adduce evidence which it would have been reasonable to adduce, they are at risk of a finding that this has not been established. The claimants also had to establish that the diversion had caused significant disruption to their businesses.

Even though it might be that strictly the claim should be cast in terms of a loss of revenue attributable to the diversion of staff time, despite this, in the ordinary case, unless the defendant could establish the contrary, it is reasonable for the court to infer from the disruption that, had their time not been thus diverted, the staff would have applied it to activities which would, directly or indirectly, have generated revenue in an amount at least equal to the costs for employing them during that time.

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll