header-logo header-logo

31 January 2008
Issue: 7306 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Anti-social behaviour order

R v Gowan [2007] EWCA (Crim) 1360, (2008) 172 JP 1

 

The defendant was convicted of threatening to kill his wife. The judge made an ASBO prohibiting him from having any contact with the complainant or going within 200m of the house where she lived, the terms of the order to be suspended until the defendant was released from custody.

 

HELD Section 1C(2) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 is directed at protecting members of the general public from an offender’s conduct and could not be used to protect a wife with whom an offender had been and would in the future be cohabiting— since she would be in the same household as the offender. The judge therefore had no power to make the order.

Issue: 7306 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll