header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CRIMINAL EVIDENCE

R v Lawson [2006] EWCA Crim 2572, (2007) 171 JP 43

Once gateway (e) in s 101 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (bad character of co-accused) is passed, there is no discretion for the judge to exclude bad character evidence.

However, an exercise of judgment is called for, because if objection is taken to the evidence being adduced, the judge must determine whether it has substantial probative value in relation to the important matter in issue which arises. That applies whether the bad character evidence is advanced as going to credibility or truthfulness, or to propensity to offend as charged.

Wherever co-accuseds propose to adduce bad character evidence under gateway (e), they should  always alert counsel for the other defendants of their intention, so that the latter can take objection, if they properly can. Judges can rule, after proper argument on both sides, whether the evidence is admissible or not.

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll