header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CRIMINAL EVIDENCE

R v Lawson [2006] EWCA Crim 2572, (2007) 171 JP 43

Once gateway (e) in s 101 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (bad character of co-accused) is passed, there is no discretion for the judge to exclude bad character evidence.

However, an exercise of judgment is called for, because if objection is taken to the evidence being adduced, the judge must determine whether it has substantial probative value in relation to the important matter in issue which arises. That applies whether the bad character evidence is advanced as going to credibility or truthfulness, or to propensity to offend as charged.

Wherever co-accuseds propose to adduce bad character evidence under gateway (e), they should  always alert counsel for the other defendants of their intention, so that the latter can take objection, if they properly can. Judges can rule, after proper argument on both sides, whether the evidence is admissible or not.

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll