header-logo header-logo

COURTS

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v Huggins [2007] All ER (D) 97 (Jan)

There is no requirement to establish, to prove a contempt of court, an intention to disrupt proceedings. The power of summary punishment is to be exercised only where necessary to protect the process of justice.

The summary procedure should be used only in exceptional cases where contempt is clearly proved and nothing else would do to protect the ends of justice. The decision to imprison a person for contempt should never be taken too quickly and there should always be time for reflection about what is the best course to take.

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn Premium Content

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

back-to-top-scroll