header-logo header-logo

25 January 2007
Issue: 7257 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digest: 26 January 2007

R (Charlson) v Guildford Magistrates’ Court [2006] EWHC 2318 (Admin), [2006] All ER (D) 41 (Sep)

When magistrates are considering whether to issue a summons for a private prosecution where the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has already brought and discontinued a prosecution arising out of the same events, they should not require special circumstances before agreeing to the issue of the summons. They should consider:

(i) whether the allegation is an offence known to the law and, if so, whether the ingredients of the offence are prima facie present;
(ii) whether the issue of the summons is time-barred;
(iii) whether the court has jurisdiction;
(iv) whether the informant has the necessary
authority to prosecute; and
(v) any other relevant facts.

Where magistrates are considering whether to issue a summons for a private prosecution where the CPS has already brought a prosecution which is still proceeding, they should, in the absence of special circumstances, be slow to issue a summons at the behest of a private prosecutor in respect of the same matter.
 

Issue: 7257 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll