header-logo header-logo

01 May 2008
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment Law

Ashcroft v Haberdashers’ Aske’s Boys’ School [2008] IRLR 375 (EAT)

The claimant was informed of the unsuccessful outcome of his internal appeal against dismissal some six hours before the three-month time time-limit for presenting a claim to the tribunal (under s 111 of the Employment Rights act 1996) expired.

Since there was no appeal pending when the time limit expired, reg 15(2) of the Employment Act 2002 (Dispute Resolution) Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/ 752) (which provides for an automatic three-month extension of the time limit where a statutory procedure is being followed when the time limit expires) did not apply.

HELD The effect of the 2004 Regulations is to encourage the employee not to bring proceedings pending the outcome of an internal appeal. Regulation 15(2) is predicated upon the assumption that there will not be an application to the employment tribunal prior to the expiry of the appeal period, and so overtakes the position established by Palmer v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council [1984] IRLR 119.

The tribunal should therefore have found that it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented his claim (the case was remitted for the tribunal to consider whether the claim had been submitted within a reasonable period thereafter).

Issue: 7319 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll