header-logo header-logo

17 April 2008
Issue: 7317 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Family law

Re S (a child) (expert evidence) [2008] All ER (D) 51 (Mar)

In instructing experts, nothing relevant should be excluded, but material that is unnecessary  because it is irrelevant must be rigorously excluded.
 

Experts have to be spared files of documents which are peripheral to their essential task. It is important that local authorities abstain from introducing into proceedings and sending to an expert  material that would be inevitably perceived by the person being assessed as unfair in the sense that it was  prejudicial.

Issue: 7317 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Test Article Upgrade

Test Article Upgrade

"Neque porro quisquam est qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit...""There is no one who loves pain itself, who seeks after it and wants to have it, simply because it is pain..."

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal expands Midlands residential development team

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn adds employee benefits and executive compensation practice in London with partner Richard Surtees

NEWS

Family lawyers cite financial disincentives for issuing child protection orders

A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
Employers cannot rely on wellbeing services alone to defend workplace stress claims after a High Court decision awarding almost £1m to an overworked employee
back-to-top-scroll