header-logo header-logo

13 August 2009
Issue: 7382 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Solicitor’s undertaking

Clark and another v Lucas Solicitors LLP [2009] EWHC 1952 (Ch), [2009] All ER (D) 11 (Aug)

Clark and another v Lucas Solicitors LLP [2009] EWHC 1952 (Ch), [2009] All ER (D) 11 (Aug)

In the absence of evidence that an undertaking was impossible to perform, performance of the undertaking would usually be required.

However, where there was an impossibility or it was otherwise inappropriate to order the undertaking to be performed, the court could exercise its discretion to order the solicitor to compensate for the loss caused by the breach of undertaking.

The fact that the undertaking required a third party to do an act did not preclude the court from exercising its supervisory jurisdiction, but it was a factor to be considered by the court in determining whether or not to exercise its discretion.

An undertaking could be performed by the payment of a cheque, albeit a larger one than might have been payable had enquiries been made and agreement reached at the appropriate time.

Issue: 7382 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll