header-logo header-logo

13 August 2009
Issue: 7382 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Building contract

Windglass Windows Ltd v Capital Skyline Construction Ltd and another [2009] EWHC 2022 (TCC), [2009] All ER (D) 17 (Aug)

Section 111 of the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 required a withholding notice which set out grounds for withholding money otherwise due; any argument to the contrary went against the express words of the section.

Moreover, the Act did not permit a party to put in an ineffective withholding notice and then, in the subsequent adjudication, seek to put together an entirely different justification for withholding payment.

The Act emphasised the obligation on the paying party to give good reasons, there and then and in advance of the date for payment, if any part of a sum otherwise due was not going to be paid. If that paying party did not do so, then it had to “pay now and argue later”.
 

Issue: 7382 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll