header-logo header-logo

06 August 2009
Issue: 7381 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment law

Shaw v Remploy Ltd [2009] All ER (D) 294 (Jul)

Regulation 15 of the Employment Act 2002 (Dispute Resolution) Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/752) encouraged grievance procedures to happen, but it was of utility only once.

It did nothing more than provide an extension of time from three to six months in an unfair dismissal case.

It did not depend upon there being a procedure in place, but only upon the reasonable belief in the mind of the employee.

It was limited to a moment in time, namely, the time the primary limitation period expired. If the claimant had that reasonable belief, she would get an extension of time in which to bring a claim.

It was plainly envisaged that three months was sufficient for any internal procedure to be exhausted.
 

Issue: 7381 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll