header-logo header-logo

CIVIL LITIGATION

12 June 2008
Issue: 7325 / Categories: Case law , Procedure & practice , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Hicks v Russell Jones & Walker [2007] EWCA Civ 844, [2008] 2 All ER 1089

Rule 52.10(2)(b) of the Civil Procedure Rules gives the appeal court power to refer any claim or issue for determination by the lower court. Normally, that is likely to arise where the appeal court has taken a view that a particular issue is necessary for decision, but that it could be better for it to be decided at first instance.

The power is defined in sufficiently general terms to allow, in a case where it appears to be just and convenient, for a point to be referred back for determination by the lower court, even if it is only contingently relevant in the context of an appeal that is still pending (Lord Justice Lloyd at 15).

Issue: 7325 / Categories: Case law , Procedure & practice , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll