header-logo header-logo

26 June 2008
Issue: 7327 / Categories: Case law , Terms&conditions , Law digest , Employment
printer mail-detail

EMPLOYMENT LAW

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Annabels (Berkeley Square) Ltd [2008] All ER (D) 170 (Jun)

The statutory scheme established by the National Minimum Wage Act 1998 specifically defines what “remuneration” means by reference to the question whether or not money payments paid to workers are paid by the employer. That question calls for a precise legal analysis of the payment. The question is determined by the answer to the question “who owned the money which was paid to the employees at the point they were paid”?

It followed that, where restaurant or bar service charges are paid by the customer to the employer, but are then paid into a “troncmaster’s” bank account for distribution by him in accordance with a “tronc scheme” agreed between the troncmaster and employees, the sums so distributed to employees are not “paid by the employer” for the purposes of being included in  the national minimum wage calculation.

Issue: 7327 / Categories: Case law , Terms&conditions , Law digest , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll