header-logo header-logo

Civil litigation

19 March 2009
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Ofulue v Bossert [2009] UKHL 16, [2009] All ER (D) 119 (Mar)

It is strongly arguable that the principles which govern the admissibility, in subsequent proceedings, of a statement made in “without prejudice” negotiations to settle earlier proceedings, should be the same as those which would govern its admissibility in those earlier proceedings, especially where the two sets of proceedings involve the same parties and very closely connected issues.

Issue: 7361 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll