header-logo header-logo

14 August 2008
Issue: 7334 / Categories: Case law , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Employment
printer mail-detail

Law digest: 14 August 2008

Employment law

Cannop v Highland Council [2008] IRLR 634, [2008] CSIH 38

To satisfy the statutory grievance procedure there has to be some correlation between the grievance relied on and the claim submitted; the question is whether or not the underlying the claim presented to the tribunal is essentially the same grievance as was earlier communicated. The grievance document need not necessarily be read in isolation: there may have been earlier communications with the employer which provide a context in which the grievance document falls to be interpreted. Events subsequent to the communication of the grievance document may illuminate the nature and scope of the grievance. Further, there may be some circumstances in which the employee does not have access to the full facts; in such circumstances it may be sufficient to frame a grievance statement based on a suspicion or set of suspicions that certain facts exist.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll