header-logo header-logo

11 September 2008
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Trademarks

esure Insurance Ltd v Direct Line Insurance plc [2008] EWCA Civ 842, [2008] All ER (D) 313 (Jul)

In assessing the likelihood of trademark confusion, this must be ascertained from the viewpoint of the average consumer, and a global assessment must be made of all the relevant factors (which involves examining all the aural, visual and conceptual similarities of the marks and assessing the weight to be given to each of the relevant characteristics).

 Given that the critical issue of confusion of any kind is to be assessed from the viewpoint of the average consumer, an expert’s report is of little value in evaluating the likelihood of confusion (although there may be a role for an expert where the markets in question are ones with which judges are unfamiliar).

Issue: 7336 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll