header-logo header-logo

Personal injury

11 September 2008
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Monk v PC Harrington Ltd [2008] EWHC 1879, [2008] All ER (D) 20 (Aug)

(i) In order to recover damages for psychiatric injury as a rescuer, it is necessary for the claimant to show that his involvement in the aftermath of the accident was such that he can fairly be described as a rescuer (and so trivial or peripheral assistance will not suffice) and that, in going to the rescue of the injured people, he objectively exposed himself to danger or reasonably believed that he was doing so.

(ii) In order to recover damages for psychiatric injury as an “unwilling participant”, the claimant’s injury must be caused by a genuine and reasonable belief that he has caused the death or injury of another.

Issue: 7336 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll