header-logo header-logo

30 October 2008
Issue: 7343 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law

Chagger v Abbey National plc [2008] All ER (D) 157 (Oct)

(i) Claimants who formulate their claim on the basis of “colour discrimination” will inevitably be complaining of discrimination on the ground of race and ethnic origin, and two factors which explicitly attract the operation of s 54A of the Race Relations Act 1976.

(ii) In assessing compensation in a discrimination case, it is relevant to take into account the chance that the respondent might have caused the same damage lawfully if he had not done so on discriminatory grounds.

(iii) The risk that future potential employers may decline to employ the claimant because of the claim which he has brought is not a matter which can be reflected in his compensation: the natural scope of liability for a discriminatory dismissal does not extend beyond the injury inherent in the loss of the employment in question.

Issue: 7343 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll