header-logo header-logo

02 August 2023
Issue: 8036 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Law Commissioners to review criminal appeals process

An overhaul of the criminal appeals process is on the cards, after the Law Commission launched a major review into potential reform.

The review follows growing concern in recent years about the piecemeal development of the law governing criminal appeals, with the Justice Select Committee and the Westminster Commission on Miscarriages of Justice among those calling for reform. The commissioners will review the tests used to grant an appeal and whether court resources are being used effectively.

Specifically, the commissioners are seeking views on: the need to reform the appeals process in magistrates’ courts, whether the Court of Appeal has adequate and appropriate powers to hear appeals, and whether the tests used to grant an appeal make it too difficult to correct miscarriages of justice.

They will look into the Attorney General’s powers to refer cases to the Court of Appeal where the sentence is ‘unduly lenient’ or a legal error has been made. The commissioners are also seeking views on whether appeals are hampered by laws governing retention and disclosure of evidence and access to records of proceedings.

Professor Penney Lewis, criminal law commissioner, said: ‘We will consider proposals for reform that will ensure the appeals process provides a robust safeguard against wrongful convictions and instils confidence in the criminal justice system. 

‘We therefore welcome a wide range of responses to our issues paper to help us identify if there are areas of the law that are not working.’

A spokesperson for the Criminal Appeals Lawyers Association, said: ‘This signifies an important opportunity to bring about a more just and equitable post-conviction legal landscape.

‘We shall work with the Law Commission to strengthen the appeals system so that miscarriages of justice can be properly identified and rectified.’

More information is available at: www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/criminal-appeals. Views should be submitted by 31 October 2023.

Issue: 8036 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll