header-logo header-logo

LASPO backlash

26 March 2015 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7646 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
robins_3

Jon Robins laments the foreseeable consequences of the MoJ’s legal aid vanishing act

“What would a progressive government need to do, to ensure access to justice for social welfare in the 21st century?” This is the slightly unwieldy subtitle to a new study (Magna Carta today?) published earlier this month by Unite, the country’s largest union, and Goldsmiths, University of London, which outlines a seven-point plan to give greater access to justice to the thousands of people hit by the government’s Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO).

What, indeed? As I have written before in this column, Labour’s shadow justice team has pledged to look again at cuts to the criminal legal aid budget, but have made no such commitment to review the civil cuts of April 2013. So what might other “progressive” parties do? “Reverse all of the cuts,” replied Charley Pattison, criminal defence barrister and a spokesperson for the Greens on justice issues. It’s an admirably straight response (but, then again, easy for the Greens to say).

Election countdown

As the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll