header-logo header-logo

10 October 2023
Issue: 8044 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Landmark judgment on underpaid holiday claims

Employment lawyers have welcomed a Supreme Court ruling that gaps of three months or more do not break a series of holiday underpayments when employees are bringing claims

The landmark judgment last week, Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland v Agnew [2023] UKSC 33, means thousands of police staff in Northern Ireland can claim up to 35 years' worth of miscalculated holiday pay.

The claimants, police officers and civilian staff, brought claims for miscalculated holiday pay dating back to 1998. The dispute concerned whether a statutory provision applied, time-barring claims for underpayments going back further than three months.

Colin Godfrey, employment lawyer at Taylor Wessing, said: ‘This means that gaps of more than three months will no longer prevent individuals bringing claims for a series of underpaid holidays.’

Andy Williams, partner, Stevens & Bolton, said: ‘Until [this judgment], the position in England, Wales and Scotland had been governed by the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s (EAT) 2013 finding in the case of Bear Scotland [Bear Scotland Ltd v Fulton [2015] ICR 221 (EAT)], that a gap of more than three months in a series of underpayments was sufficient to extinguish the right to bring claims in respect of any earlier underpayments. 

‘Likewise, the EAT inferred that making a payment for holiday at the correct rate of pay could also break a series of deductions. The EAT’s finding in Bear Scotland has come under criticism and [this] judgment will come as no surprise to many.

‘The Supreme Court’s judgment will be of grave concern to many employers, as it greatly increases the potential cost of historic holiday pay claims. Employers in Great Britain (ie those in England, Wales and Scotland) may still, however, take comfort from the two year limit on historic holiday pay claims [under the Deduction from Wages (Limitation) Regulations 2014].’  

Issue: 8044 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll