header-logo header-logo

18 October 2022
Issue: 7999 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Landmark COVID-19 business interruption case

Bakery chain Greggs, the Slug & Lettuce and other household name businesses have won their multi-million COVID-19 business interruption insurance claims at the High Court.

Mr Justice Butcher held substantially in favour of Stonegate, Greggs and Various Eateries in three complex judgments, Stonegate Pub & Ors v Amlin Corporate, Liberty Mutual & Ors [2022] EWHC 2549 (Comm).

Stonegate, which owns 760 pubs and eateries, argued it was entitled to an indemnity in respect of three perils (disease, enforced closure, and prevention of access), that it suffered business interruption losses attributable to multiple triggers and that there was a £15m limit for each single business interruption loss (SBIL).

The insurers accepted they had liability for business interruption loss but had contended it was all attributable to ‘a single occurrence’, was to be aggregated as an SBIL subject to a £2.5m limit, and that this sum had already been paid out to Stonegate in 2020.

Similarly, insurers Zurich contended there was only one ‘single occurrence’ under Greggs’ policy, limiting the bakery to a £2.5m pay-out only.

Greggs successfully argued the £2.5m limit applied each time the Westminster and devolved governments adopted a major COVID restriction measure. Butcher J held there was a single occurrence at the outset of lockdown in March 2020 followed by separate occurrences in each jurisdiction and on each adjustment.

Butcher J also held that regulations which merely continued existing restrictions or made trivial changes did not trigger an extra £2.5m limit.

Manoj Vaghela, partner at Charles Russell Speechlys, which acted for Greggs, said: ‘This outcome vindicates Greggs commencing proceedings and has wider implications for all businesses that purchased the Resilience Insurance policies.

‘Insurers’ argument that there was only one limit available for Covid business interruption losses has been firmly rejected.’

The case now proceeds to phase 2, where the value of recoverable loss is calculated.

Issue: 7999 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll