header-logo header-logo

10 December 2019
Issue: 7868 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Landmark adoption decision

A couple whose wish to adopt was rebuffed because of their Indian heritage have won their discrimination claim

Adopt Berkshire declined to progress Sandeep and Reena Mander’s application on the basis they only had white British pre-school children available, already had a surfeit of white British pre-approved prospective adopters and priority would be given to white couples. The agency suggested they adopt a child from India.

Ruling in Mander & Mander v Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead at Oxford County Court, Judge Melissa Clarke held that the couple were discriminated against on the grounds of race. She awarded them general damages of £29,000 and special damages of £60,000 damages for the cost of adopting overseas. The couple have now adopted a child from the US.

The council said it always put the interests of the child first and would review its policies.

Issue: 7868 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll