header-logo header-logo

10 December 2019
Issue: 7868 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Landmark adoption decision

A couple whose wish to adopt was rebuffed because of their Indian heritage have won their discrimination claim

Adopt Berkshire declined to progress Sandeep and Reena Mander’s application on the basis they only had white British pre-school children available, already had a surfeit of white British pre-approved prospective adopters and priority would be given to white couples. The agency suggested they adopt a child from India.

Ruling in Mander & Mander v Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead at Oxford County Court, Judge Melissa Clarke held that the couple were discriminated against on the grounds of race. She awarded them general damages of £29,000 and special damages of £60,000 damages for the cost of adopting overseas. The couple have now adopted a child from the US.

The council said it always put the interests of the child first and would review its policies.

Issue: 7868 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll