header-logo header-logo

02 November 2012
Issue: 7536 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Landlord and tenant

Re Teathers Ltd; Baroque Investments Ltd v Heis and another [2012] EWHC 2886 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 203 (Oct)

Section 18(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927 Act imposed a limit on what might be recovered to “the amount (if any) by which the value of the reversion is diminished owing to the breach of” the covenant to keep the demised property in repair. Further, the ascertainment of that amount necessarily required the valuation of the reversion to the property in its actual state and in its repaired state. Furthermore, a valuation of the reversion necessarily assumed that a purchaser would take it subject to the lease with the benefit and burden of all the covenants and other stipulations it contained for the remainder of the term.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll