header-logo header-logo

28 November 2008 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Opinion , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

A lame duck?

Alistair Darling and the Pre Budget Report proved to be a disappointing combination, says Peter Vaines

I was asked to write a light-hearted piece about the Pre Budget Report—but as we are dealing with Mr Brown, Mr Darling and a global catastrophe, light hearts are rather hard to come by. Faint hearts perhaps—but please not from the chancellor.

We all thought this would be a Budget with a difference—like he was going to reduce taxes. Except that this time his proposals have to work. No more sound bites or playing to the gallery…this is really serious. The economy needs TLC like never before. And Mr Darling Brown (I never can tell which) is the man to do it.

Dream on. Could anybody with any appreciation of the situation, or the mood, have said with a straight face that it’s OK because everything is going to be back in balance by the year 2016!

However, the chancellor did announce some tax cuts, although that is perhaps an odd description because most of the changes are tax increases. The only tax cuts I could find

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll