header-logo header-logo

LAFRA 2024: leaseholders in limbo

21 November 2025 / Shabnam Ali-Khan
Issue: 8140 / Categories: Opinion , Leasehold , Property
printer mail-detail
236044
The government must now consult with professionals on leasehold reform, writes Shabnam Ali-Khan

Renters rights may be grabbing the headlines this month, but leasehold reform is rarely off the news agenda, and rightly so: the system has been criticised for opacity, unfairness and cost. Yet after the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 (LAFRA 2024)—hurried through in the last Parliament—and with a new Leasehold and Commonhold Reform Bill on the horizon, the sector finds itself in limbo.

Leaseholders were promised clarity, simplicity and savings. More than a year later, too little of the Act has been implemented, secondary legislation has been delayed, and crucial test cases are stalled in the courts. Meanwhile, professionals are advising clients through these uncertain times, leaseholders are unsure whether to act now or wait, and the market has been affected. In the unanimous view of professionals, further reform must not be made without genuine consultation and collaboration with those who deal with leasehold every day.

A year of uncertainty

LAFRA 2024 was billed as a watershed moment, ‘making it cheaper and easier’—as the last government

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll