header-logo header-logo

30 June 2011 / Lesley Hughes , Rachael Reynolds
Issue: 7472 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Know your limits

Lesley Hughes & Rachael Reynolds report on restrictive covenants & the power of the lands tribunal

Restrictive covenants affecting development land are common. For a developer, they are obstacles to maximising value—but they are rarely viewed as insurmountable. Money is set aside to buy off those with the benefit of the covenant where known, to obtain indemnity insurance where not or, as a last resort, an application is made to the lands tribunal for the modification or release of the covenant to allow the development to proceed. While developers are generally aware that this third option is dogged by the delay and costs involved, they often assume that once the procedural hurdles have been overcome they will get the order they seek. Is it safe to make this assumption? The recent lands tribunal decision in George Wimpey Bristol Ltd and Gloucestershire Housing Association Ltd [2011] UKUT 91 (LC) provides a clear warning for developers.

The law

The power of the lands tribunal to modify or release restrictive covenants is set out in s 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll