header-logo header-logo

08 September 2023 / Dr Graham Zellick CBE KC FAcSS
Issue: 8039 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Knights in scarlet

136499
Graham Zellick looks into the pros, cons & wherewithals of knighthoods & damehoods for High Court judges
  • Examines the arguments for and against the conferring of titles on High Court judges when those titles are not used in court.

The custom of knighting the king’s judges originated in the days when judges were very few in number, were seen as emissaries of the king in dispensing his justice throughout the realm, and when it was commonplace to confer the accolade of knighthood on everyone holding high public office. There was at that time no Court of Appeal or Law Lords, so the king’s judges sat at the apex of the rudimentary justice system.

There is no other occupational group which now receives knighthoods or the female equivalent (DBE, DCMG, DCB) on appointment. There are many offices that typically attract such an honour either some way into the appointment or on retirement (for example, permanent secretaries and their equivalent, senior ambassadors, three-star rank in the armed forces, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner) and some where the custom has been withdrawn entirely,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll