header-logo header-logo

17 August 2016 / Dominic Regan
Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Costs , CPR , Jackson
printer mail-detail

Keeping it civil

Dominic Regan reviews the litigation year so far

This has been a phenomenal 2016 for those involved in civil litigation. We have acquired a new tort, seen an old head expanded beyond belief and had more twists on the procedural front. And it is still only August.

Supreme work

The Supreme Court has been industrious. In Willers v Joyce [2016] UKSC 43, [2016] All ER (D) 97 (Jul) a full house of nine judges sat and decided, 5-4, that the tort of malicious prosecution includes the prosecution of civil proceedings. The claimant sought damages including the shortfall in costs he incurred after an action against him (alleged to have been motivated by malice), was discontinued at the last moment. The gap was a hefty £2.2m.The claim was leapfrogged to the Supreme Court.

The majority view was that the action was viable and should go to trial. The vociferous minority included Lords Sumption and Neuberger. The President stopped enumerating his grounds for rejecting the extension of liability when he said "Twelfthly"!

The most highly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll