header-logo header-logo

10 March 2021
Issue: 7924 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Health & safety , Profession
printer mail-detail

Keep courts infection-free

Concerns around COVID-19 safety measures as Isleworth falls short

Lawyers have expressed fears about safety in court after Isleworth Crown Court failed a Health and Safety Executive (HSE) COVID-19 inspection on cleaning and social distancing measures.

The inspector visited the court on 29 January and identified contraventions relating to ‘cleaning regimes, social distancing and the monitoring of occupancy levels within the building’, an HSE spokesperson said. HM Courts and Tribunals (HMCTS) have been issued with a notification of contravention and asked to respond to the inspector by 12 April.

Solicitors have raised concerns with the Law Society about potential risks at courts throughout the pandemic. These have included concerns about the enforcement of face masks in public and communal areas, the frequency of cleaning, and having to take instructions in confined and unventilated rooms where social distancing is impossible to maintain. Solicitors have complained of being required to attend court in-person for matters they believed could reasonably be dealt with via remote means.

Law Society president David Greene said: ‘Even though we may be seeing a planned exit from the pandemic it remains absolutely essential that all court users can be assured of the safety of the court environment.

‘If that cannot be assured, as appears to be the case at Isleworth, HMCTS must take immediate action―including possibly closing a court―until it can be.’ 

Safety measures such as plexiglass screens, social distancing marks and frequent cleaning have been implemented to keep court users safe.

However, fears about unsafe courts emerged in January, when the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) revealed figures showing 434 court staff, 69 judges and magistrates, 23 jurors and 73 other court users tested positive for COVID-19 between 24 November 2020 and 11 January 2021. Cases were confirmed at 196 courts within the same period.

The MoJ pointed out that this rate tracked the national average and it should not be assumed that infection took place at court.

Issue: 7924 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Health & safety , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll