header-logo header-logo

Justices hear landmark wills case

14 December 2016
Issue: 7727 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Three charities put their case before the Supreme Court this week in the long-running wills case of Ilott v Mitson.

Melita Jackson died in 2004, leaving most of her estate to animal charities and nothing for her estranged daughter, who left home at 17 to live with her boyfriend. Jackson had no connection with the charities during her lifetime. The daughter, Mrs Ilott, who depends on state benefits, made a claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. 

Last summer the Court of Appeal held that the daughter should receive one third of the estate (see Ilott v Mitson [2015] EWCA Civ 797). The charities—the Blue Cross, RSPB and RSPCA— appealed.

Richard Kershaw, family law partner at Hunters Solicitors, said: “This is a matter of precedent for the charities but a matter of real need for Mrs Ilott.

“If the Supreme Court upholds the Court of Appeal, it will push the door ajar and encourage many more cases of this kind in future.”

Issue: 7727 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll